Pancake Man Takes a Swing...and Slips in A Puddle of Syrup
Response to Opinion article titled,
"Terrorists Attack California Post Office"
Published in the September 2006 issue of Waubonsee Insight.
It's funny enough when someone writes something crazy and deranged and sends it in to the paper as a Letter to the Editor. But then, the farther removed from that medium you get, the funnier it gets. A MySpace post ranting about me was pretty much the most entertaining thing I had found, until a colleague forwarded me the link of two poor people who were attacking me on, of all things, a blog about pancakes.
Thus, the Pancake Man was born. Enjoy as much as I did.
Ironically, the review of the restaurant was BEFORE the Opinion section, so his comment about having to "wade through" my article is so stupid it makes the entire piece in and of itself. The rest is just icing on the cake of ignorance.
"Terrorists Attack California Post Office"
Published in the September 2006 issue of Waubonsee Insight.
It's funny enough when someone writes something crazy and deranged and sends it in to the paper as a Letter to the Editor. But then, the farther removed from that medium you get, the funnier it gets. A MySpace post ranting about me was pretty much the most entertaining thing I had found, until a colleague forwarded me the link of two poor people who were attacking me on, of all things, a blog about pancakes.
Thus, the Pancake Man was born. Enjoy as much as I did.
It's just hard to wade through the painful editorial rhetoric found in the Waubonsee Community College Insight, penned primarily by one faithful student of the Rush Limbaugh/Michael Savage school of balanced, empathetic journalism, who was somehow appointed to the position of editor in chief. So finding the restaurant review means sifting through not just page-length tirades on illegal immigrants and liberals, but also self-congratulatory reminders of how his controversial "freedom fries" article really got everyone talking last fall. Thankfully, the restaurant review was left to a different student, but her description of it still seemed a bit embellished.
Ironically, the review of the restaurant was BEFORE the Opinion section, so his comment about having to "wade through" my article is so stupid it makes the entire piece in and of itself. The rest is just icing on the cake of ignorance.